Oh no, manifesto

Today brings us a generous and slightly pompous apology from the editor of VQR to anyone who was offended by a recent blog entry; plus, a promise of yet another literary manifesto:

For now, suffice to say that we have certain things that we want so fiercely from American literature that we have made a misstep. We have descended in our discourse, when it is our stated mission to elevate the level of discussion whenever possible. That said, thoughtful articulation of what we envision—our call to arms, our mini-manifesto—will take a while to draft. We hope your interest in this subject is more than fleeting and deeper than personal indignation. We hope that you, too, care about what ails American literature and will have the patience to wait for our more considered statement and engage in an extended, productive discussion.

Okay, “mini-manifesto.” Personally, I think we’ve had plenty calls to arms lately. But I’m all in favor of discussion and look forward to it. I hope that if you care about what ails American literature* you’ll participate, too.

*Bearing in mind, of course, that question-begging is the traditional engine of the manifesto project.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 733 other followers