<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confused about simultaneous submissions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cvillewords.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cvillewords.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/</link>
	<description>Reading and writing in the heart of Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simultaneous submissions break hearts &#171; Charlottesville Words</title>
		<link>http://cvillewords.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simultaneous submissions break hearts &#171; Charlottesville Words]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cvillewords.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] No Comments  Poking around on the Glimmer Train site, I find a sterner than usual warning about simultaneous submissions: Simultaneous submissions are not okay, I&#8217;m sorry, especially in competitions. (It breaks our [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Comments  Poking around on the Glimmer Train site, I find a sterner than usual warning about simultaneous submissions: Simultaneous submissions are not okay, I&#8217;m sorry, especially in competitions. (It breaks our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Congratulations! &#171; Charlottesville Words</title>
		<link>http://cvillewords.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Congratulations! &#171; Charlottesville Words]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 18:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cvillewords.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] May 15th, 2007 &#183; No Comments  Check out this bit of good news for Clifford Garstang of Perpetual Folly, along with a real-life example of how to handle simultaneous submissions. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 15th, 2007 &middot; No Comments  Check out this bit of good news for Clifford Garstang of Perpetual Folly, along with a real-life example of how to handle simultaneous submissions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://cvillewords.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 17:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cvillewords.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great comments, thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Garstang</title>
		<link>http://cvillewords.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cliff Garstang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 12:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cvillewords.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Erika (a classmate of mine, by the way) that the no-simsub policies can and should be ignored, and I do. I usually also don&#039;t mention in a cover letter that I&#039;m simsubbing, even if guidelines request it. I think editors should and probably do assume that all submisstions are also under consideration elsewhere. I have generally been pretty prompt at withdrawing stories from other magazines once they&#039;ve been accepted somewhere. Early on in my subbing experience, though, I didn&#039;t do that but it worked to my advantage. A good online journal took a story and a short time later a nice (but small-circulation) print journal accepted the same piece. I explained the circumstances and to my surprise they were willing to take it as a reprint. So that was great--a twofer!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Erika (a classmate of mine, by the way) that the no-simsub policies can and should be ignored, and I do. I usually also don&#8217;t mention in a cover letter that I&#8217;m simsubbing, even if guidelines request it. I think editors should and probably do assume that all submisstions are also under consideration elsewhere. I have generally been pretty prompt at withdrawing stories from other magazines once they&#8217;ve been accepted somewhere. Early on in my subbing experience, though, I didn&#8217;t do that but it worked to my advantage. A good online journal took a story and a short time later a nice (but small-circulation) print journal accepted the same piece. I explained the circumstances and to my surprise they were willing to take it as a reprint. So that was great&#8211;a twofer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kempis</title>
		<link>http://cvillewords.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kempis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cvillewords.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/confused-about-simultaneous-submissions/#comment-2035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not at a place where submitting is something I have to think about.  However... I would say yes to submitting multiple places- regardless of what the policies are supposed to be.   

By restricting simultaneous submissions the Journals are trying to unfairly maintain the upper hand.   

When an agent auctions a novel or screenplay - the competition is what gets the author that fat check.  That&#039;s what journals want to avoid- competing for an author&#039;s writing.   

 An unpublished writer needs the low or no paying Journals to establish a track record before moving on to larger and more profitable endeavors.  To me that says to get published as often and quickly as possible.  

When you play by someone else&#039;s rules you set yourself up to lose.  When you can make (and get others to play by)  your own rules then you&#039;ve set yourself up to win.  I believe that to be one of the keys to success in any endeavor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not at a place where submitting is something I have to think about.  However&#8230; I would say yes to submitting multiple places- regardless of what the policies are supposed to be.   </p>
<p>By restricting simultaneous submissions the Journals are trying to unfairly maintain the upper hand.   </p>
<p>When an agent auctions a novel or screenplay &#8211; the competition is what gets the author that fat check.  That&#8217;s what journals want to avoid- competing for an author&#8217;s writing.   </p>
<p> An unpublished writer needs the low or no paying Journals to establish a track record before moving on to larger and more profitable endeavors.  To me that says to get published as often and quickly as possible.  </p>
<p>When you play by someone else&#8217;s rules you set yourself up to lose.  When you can make (and get others to play by)  your own rules then you&#8217;ve set yourself up to win.  I believe that to be one of the keys to success in any endeavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

